• 3 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2020

help-circle

  • Various countries limit painkillers to small packet sizes (e.g. 20 pills here in Germany) and pharmacies only hand them out one at a time, so you can’t overdose as easily/spontaneously, either like the person in the post did due to pain, or for suicidal purposes.
    It’s not perfect protection, as you can just go to multiple pharmacies to buy multiple packets, but yeah, you will have to actually go do that and will get told at the pharmacy that you shouldn’t take more, if you’re not aware.





  • Ephera@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneSilence Rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Yeah, I once saw the Uno Reverse card of this, where some horrid, conservative Indian media outlet was saying some shit like the EU is holding some bad position. And the guy, who had posted that article, would not even engage in discussion that this was a massive point of contention, where neither France and Germany, nor me and my neighbor agreed. It just felt like shit. Don’t drag me into what the assholes are doing, please.




  • Ephera@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldArt is subjective
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    So, what’s happening is that it interprets a number at the start of a line, followed by a dot, to be an enumeration:

    1. One
    2. Two
    3. Three

    And then it indents that text to a certain fixed width, which is why a very long number sticks out to the left.

    Why your comment didn’t work, is for two reasons:

    1. It stops interpreting a number as an enumeration when you go beyond 9 digits. That’s why your first and last example didn’t work.
    2. It automatically ‘fixes’ the enumeration, if the numbers aren’t successors. I actually wrote “123456789.” at the start of this line, but it changes it to a “2.”. That’s why the “2334.” and “23145524.” you wrote got changed to a “124.” and “125.”, which made them too short to really look broken.




  • That would be cool, but human brains are weirdos. If you’re already copying text, you could’ve edited or annotated it, for example. For example, if it’s an opinion you don’t entirely agree with, you might feel obliged to say so, because you have the ability to do so when it’s a text post.

    If you want to call that irrational, I’m not arguing against that. I’m just saying it’s the reality we live in and I’d like to have tooling to deal with that better, because I would also prefer text to not be screenshotted.


  • Yeah, really unfortunate that that’s not possible. Always having to take a screenshot and then type out letter by letter what’s on the screenshot, that can be quite annoying.

    But even if copying text was possible, the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content, so that it’s clear that they don’t necessarily hold the exact same opinion or that they might not have all the knowledge to defend the statements in the post.

    Cross-posting could fill that same roll without screenshotting text.